Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 2  | Molecular Autism

Fig. 2 

From: Atypical gaze patterns in autistic adults are heterogeneous across but reliable within individuals

Fig. 2 

High within-individual reliability in ASD. A, B Individual participants’ percentage of on-screen gaze time is plotted using data from two separate videos. Individual participants are denoted by red-yellow (ASD) or dark–light blue (TD) spectrum colors that encode the percentage of gaze time to faces in Episode A (panels D, E; as in Fig. 1A, B) and the same participant-wise color codes were used for other panels (panels A, B, G, H, J, and K). Triangular (circular) markers indicate participants from Caltech (IU) site. Line: Pearson’s correlation and bootstrapped CI are depicted for visualization purposes, but Spearman’s correlation was used to assess reliability in gaze patterns. D, E Individual participants’ percentage of gaze time to faces is plotted from two separate videos. G, H Individual participants’ percentage of gaze time to eyes is plotted from two separate videos. J, K Individual participants’ average gaze heatmap correlation with TD reference gaze heatmaps. C, F, I, L Sampling analysis based on 10-min epoch from the videos and bootstrap resampling of individual participants

Back to article page