Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Molecular Autism

Fig. 2

From: Spontaneous instrumental approach-avoidance learning in social contexts in autism

Fig. 2

Summary of behavioural results from the categorical approach. Thick-contour dots represent means, while error bars represent 95% confidence intervals for the normal distribution. Shaded points represent individual participant means. A: Mean proportion of hits across the task, as a function of participant strategy and gender. B: Mean proportion of hits over the first 20 trials across blocks of stable action-outcome contingencies (trial 1 = reversal trial). The fitted curve represents the best fit (and 95% confidence interval) for the hyperbolic function y = 1–1/(1 + x) previously used in Mennella et al. (2022) and confirms the results for the mean proportion of hits (A). C & D: Mean proportion of action repetitions following either approach or avoidance outcomes in the angry and happy versions of the reinforcement learning task, as a function of participant strategy (C) and gender (D). Symbols: p < 0.001 ***; p < 0.01 **, p < 0.05 *, p < 0.1 ~

Back to article page